Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- From: Jan Schulz <jan@katzien.de>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:52:48 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1785432210.20031009195248@katzien.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3F858E30.5030000@kaffe.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20031008155622.51421.qmail@web13203.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 881431482.20031008190342@katzien.de> <[🔎] 3F858E30.5030000@kaffe.org>
Hello Dalibor, Thursday, October 9, 2003, 6:34:56 PM, you wrote: >> I'm waiting for the screams... > /me screams: not the same discussion again! ;) Thanks! :) [...big snip, complete ACK...] > Unfortunately, the Xerces J developers don't want to lose that 'feature' > so the miserable code will stay in, preventing the next release of > Xerces-J from being buildable on any free VM. Than I'm particulary happy, that eclipse will lose the internal xerces in the next version :) Jan
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@kaffe.org>
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- References:
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- From: Ricky Clarkson <ricky_clarkson@yahoo.com>
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- From: Jan Schulz <jan@katzien.de>
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@kaffe.org>
- Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- Prev by Date: Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- Next by Date: Bug#212863: finjava: a tentative summary
- Previous by thread: Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- Next by thread: Re: findjava is the question, is fixjava the answer?
- Index(es):