---

---

• To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Subject: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
• From: Daniel Bonniot <Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr>
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:04:53 +0100
• Message-id: <3FB213D5.4040305@inria.fr>
• In-reply-to: <3FB20B6A.1090409@debian.org>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310262331260.12288-100000@dent.z42.de> <20031109.001903.74756933.toraneko@kun.ne.jp> <3FB20B6A.1090409@debian.org>

---

I don't disagree but I think the FTP admins will reject the package after reading the "ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected a few days ago" thread in -devel, especially http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00766.html.

And why do you think that? The cases look quite different to me.

Daniel

---

Reply to:

• debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Daniel Bonniot (on-list)
• Daniel Bonniot (off-list)

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
    • From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@debian.org>

• References:
  • Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
    • From: Takashi Okamoto <toraneko@kun.ne.jp>
  • Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
    • From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@debian.org>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread