Re: Kaffe in testing
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Kaffe in testing
- From: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:49:59 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <20031126.234959.109057217.avdyk@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20031126162858.GX9377@dijkstra.csh.rit.edu>
- References: <20031120.163509.56557145.avdyk@debian.org> <3FBE7250.1000107@brainfood.com> <20031126162858.GX9377@dijkstra.csh.rit.edu>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:28:58 -0500 Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > > > I mean, the fix won't go into stable anyway since it isn't security > > related, right? > > This is a myth that somehow continues to be perpetuated despite a list of > criteria in every message that Joey sends about point release preparation, > and the flow of bugfixed packages from proposed-updates into 3.0r2 that > happened just a few days ago. Matt, Do we really have to spend our time to make a patch for the version of kaffe in stable? In this case, if we can build kaffe 1.1.2 (or 1.1.3) with everything in stable, we can directly upload the latest release, it fixes many bugs that are in the version in stable! Best regards, -- .''`. Arnaud Vandyck : :' : http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/ `. `' `-
Attachment:
pgpyNKaxosuk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- References:
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- From: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: Kaffe in testing
- Prev by Date: Re: Apache mod_jk
- Next by Date: Re: Kaffe in testing
- Previous by thread: Re: Kaffe in testing
- Next by thread: Re: Kaffe in testing
- Index(es):