---

---

• To: Eric Bruneton <Eric.Bruneton@rd.francetelecom.com>
• Cc: Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de>, Discussion about JPackage project <jpackage-discuss@zarb.org>, architecture@objectweb.org, gentoo-java@gentoo.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
• From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:46:08 +0100
• Message-id: <[🔎] 1075718767.22070.2.camel@ulysse.olympe.o2t>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200402021026.18018.Eric.Bruneton@rd.francetelecom.com>
• References: <4017009B.5050507@anti-microsoft.org> <[🔎] 1075649046.32404.2.camel@m222.net81-64-248.noos.fr> <[🔎] 1075654556.32404.8.camel@m222.net81-64-248.noos.fr> <[🔎] 200402021026.18018.Eric.Bruneton@rd.francetelecom.com>

---

Le lun, 02/02/2004 à 10:26 +0100, Eric Bruneton a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> > I'm done with this. The result is available at:
> >
> > http://java.debian.net/index.php/What%20is%20required%20from%20upst
> >ream

> Thanks for these guidelines. I have a few questions:

[...]


I've added a few more points that should answer your questions. Please
tell me if it is so (and other JPP/Debian/Gentoo... folks please check
if it also represents your packaging processes)

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

---

Reply to:

• debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Nicolas Mailhot (on-list)
• Nicolas Mailhot (off-list)

---

• References:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
    • From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
    • From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
    • From: Eric Bruneton <Eric.Bruneton@rd.francetelecom.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
• Next by Date: upstream guidelines for easy packaging (was: JPackages and ObjectWeb)
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread