Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- From: Vincent Fourmond <fourmond@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:27:50 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 47CC5136.9010005@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 47CC474B.2030001@zorglub.s.bawue.de>
- References: <[🔎] 18380.3901.840494.649305@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 47CC474B.2030001@zorglub.s.bawue.de>
Hello Eric, Eric Lavarde wrote: > I don't see the advantage of this approach over well defined virtual > packages, which I notice you seem anyway to implicitly expect > (java5-runtime, java5-sdk, etc...). > Can you perhaps elaborate a bit on this? Autobuilders cannot work with virtual packages. pbuilder cannot either. Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ?
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- References:
- Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- From: Eric Lavarde <deb@zorglub.s.bawue.de>
- Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- Prev by Date: Processed: submitter 395372
- Next by Date: Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- Previous by thread: Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- Next by thread: Re: Introducing distro-{jre,jre-headless,jdk,jdk-builddep} packages
- Index(es):