Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)

To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Cc: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>, Debian Java Liste <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:57:55 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090216145755.GC12726@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Andrew Overholt <overholt@redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 49994340.1020307@debian.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0812291212530.13521@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 49994340.1020307@debian.org>

Hi,

* Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> [2009-02-16 05:44]:
> Andreas Tille schrieb:
> > 
> > as you can see icu4j is now accepted and available for unstable.  There
> > was some discussion which version might be best for the final goal to
> > package eclipse.  I'm waiting for input of people who tested version
> > 4.x.

In case you didn't know, Eclipse 3.5 (to be released in June 2009) has
moved to icu4j 4.0.

HTH,

Andrew

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

References:
- Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Any plans to update batik and fop in unstable
Next by Date: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread