Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:48:16 +0100
- Message-id: <4B1EAD80.1010804@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <20091208183230.GI22110@debian.org>
- References: <20091208183230.GI22110@debian.org>
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed some packages FTBFSing due to java stuff being > uninstallable[1,2]. Since quite some time already, edos checks are > performed to make sure Build-Depends are installable before trying a > build, so I'm wondering whether edos is missing something here, > whether sbuild/apt-get are failing to figure out a solution that edos > found, or whether there are some weird java bugs going on. > > 1. http://bugs.debian.org/559986 > 2. http://bugs.debian.org/560072 > > Mraw, > KiBi. Hi For the babel case aptitude revealed the following problem: default-jdk-builddep depends on gcj-jdk, which conflicts with gjdoc. This is also the case for brltty; except the gjdoc is only an indirect B-D. ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- References:
- Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- Prev by Date: Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)
- Next by Date: Re: Bug#559967: FTBFS [hppa]: method openConnection() in the type URL is not...
- Previous by thread: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- Next by thread: Re: Something fishy with java? sbuild/apt-get? edos?
- Index(es):