Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:40:28 +0100
- Message-id: <[π] 515320FC.6090908@apache.org>
- In-reply-to: <[π] 5152C0C6.4020607@debian.org>
- References: <[π] 5152BD16.30704@apache.org> <[π] 5152C0C6.4020607@debian.org>
Le 27/03/2013 10:49, Torsten Werner a Γ©crit : > I recommend orig-tar.sh because I've invented the name but probably not > the underlying idea. Uupdate is from the old age where version control > systems have not been used for Debian packages and BSD folks told us > that CVS is the perfect technology for that. ;-) Would it be worth packaging it (as part of an existing tool chain or independently) to avoid the duplication of the file in every source package? Emmanuel Bourg
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
- Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- References:
- debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
- Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- From: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
- debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- Prev by Date: RFS: ant/1.9.0-1 (new upstream release)
- Next by Date: Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- Previous by thread: Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- Next by thread: Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?
- Index(es):