Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK
- To: Joachim Zobel <jz-2013@heute-morgen.de>
- Cc: Debian Java List <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:18:14 +0200
- Message-id: <[๐] 523BF6B6.5030808@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <[๐] 1379657219.4463.8.camel@backspace.crrrwg.de>
- References: <[๐] 1379657219.4463.8.camel@backspace.crrrwg.de>
On 2013-09-20 08:06, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > An obvious workaround for > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684 > > would be to set the runtime jvm to java-7-openjdk while keeping the > compile time JVM at java 6. Is this acceptable or does it violate any > policies? > > If so, what would be a good way to do this? Adding a reasonable java-7 > as netbeans_jdkhome to netbeans.conf? > > Sincerely, > Joachim > Hi Joachim, Personally, I would say it is an acceptable work around for now. It does get in the way of removing OpenJDK-6, but as I recall we are no where near ready to do that yet. So as long as this is a temporary measure and will be replaced within the Jessie release cycle, I am supportive of that idea. As for how to do it: No clue; depends on the package and I don't know enough about netbeans to say. Though if you mess with a ".conf" file, you will probably have to do it a build time[1]. ~Niels [1] Assuming it is what we call a "conffile" and not just a "configuration file". See Policy ยง10.7 on the difference. Basically, a "conffile" must be "complete" when we install it into the .deb. A (non-"conffile") "configuration" may be "finished" on the system via e.g. postinst. But non-"conffile"s requires a lot of manual code in maintainer scripts to ensure it is (otherwise) properly handled like a "conffile". http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- From: Joachim Zobel <jz-2013@heute-morgen.de>
- Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- References:
- Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- From: Joachim Zobel <jz-2013@heute-morgen.de>
- Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- Next by Date: Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- Previous by thread: Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- Next by thread: Re: Runtime JVM != compile time JDK - acceptable?
- Index(es):