---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

---

• To: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?
• From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
• Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:31:23 +0100
• Message-id: <[🔎] 54D8D2CB.7030408@apache.org>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87egpz8828.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de>
• References: <[🔎] 87egpz8828.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de>

---

Le 09/02/2015 15:37, Hilko Bengen a écrit :

> Am I missing something?

This was the norm up to squeeze and it started changing with wheezy I
think. The policy just needs an update, there is a change pending in svn
that hasn't been uploaded yet (see #730133).

Emmanuel Bourg

---

Reply to:

• debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Emmanuel Bourg (on-list)
• Emmanuel Bourg (off-list)

---

• References:
  • Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?
    • From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>

• Prev by Date: Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?
• Next by Date: Processed: tagging 730133
• Previous by thread: Rationale for library dependencies on default-jre or default-jre-headless?
• Next by thread: Processed: tagging 730133
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread