Re: libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- To: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:34:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[๐] a13ba21d-21e5-4c76-14fa-2e3266c8fbb1@apache.org>
- In-reply-to: <[๐] 6339be6d-2f2b-c2da-d1d7-8dbfe2782752@debian.org>
- References: <[๐] 6339be6d-2f2b-c2da-d1d7-8dbfe2782752@debian.org>
Hi Alastair, Le 22/01/2019 ร 11:28, Alastair McKinstry a รฉcrit : > I have a package, coda, that provides a Java library, libcoda-java. > > As of Java 11, openjdk ICE's on the code on ppc64el. > > It builds ok on other architectures, and ok with openjdk12, but we're > not likely to ship openjdk 12 with Buster, I understand. That's right. OpenJDK 12 isn't a LTS release and will be EOL in 2 months. The current consensus is to ship only LTS releases in stable Debian releases (OpenJDK 11 for Buster, and probably OpenJDK 17 for Bullseye). > Now, libcoda-java is an Arch: all package, so it can be built ok on > other archs for ppc64el. But How should it be handled in the packaging ? At the package level you have to ensure "dpkg-buildpackage -B" doesn't build libcoda-java, but only libcoda-jni and the other arch specific packages. The arch all package will be built by an amd64 builder if you do a source upload. Emmanuel Bourg
Reply to:
- References:
- libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>
- libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- Prev by Date: libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- Next by Date: Re: Bug#919064: scala FTBFS: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/tonicsystems/jarjar/asm/commons/ModuleHashesAttribute
- Previous by thread: libcoda-java FTBFS with openjdk on
- Next by thread: Netbeans 10 status
- Index(es):