Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 1036884@bugs.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:21:49 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20240327162149.GR4300@mail.wookware.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 1036884@bugs.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20240327152702.GQ4300@mail.wookware.org>
- References: <ZHOC/M6HrV/at3D/@homer.dodds.net> <[🔎] ZgKk3tCNYmOpim3z@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2403262227250.7824@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 20240327152702.GQ4300@mail.wookware.org>
On 2024-03-27 15:27 +0000, Wookey wrote: > On 2024-03-26 22:28 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > I hacked that, and I tried to do armel and armhf as well but > > dak stopped me, whereas mini-dak was not as strict. > > What was the actual problem with uploading the images you built? Just > not having any corresponding source? Or something more complicated? Answering my own question: There have been a couple of new openjdk-17 uploads (latest is: 17_17.0.11~7ea-1) so Thorsten's bootstrap build (17.0.10+7-1) is out of date. But it does a great job of filling the self-dependency so I can build the current version. So I now have all the pieces (on armhf, not checked armel yet but hopefully it matches) Building now... Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- Prev by Date: Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- Next by Date: Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- Next by thread: Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
- Index(es):