[Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
Thomas Wouters
thomas at python.org
Tue Dec 19 08:59:07 CET 2006
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list
Tue Dec 19 08:59:07 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Next message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition, or > did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former to > help transition but in the latter. > Development-transition only. I want to start doing it now (or next week, or at some point in the future) without having to think about the actual transition from py2x->py3k. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20061219/e15c3fee/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Next message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list