[Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Tue Dec 19 19:58:39 CET 2006
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list
Tue Dec 19 19:58:39 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Next message: [Python-3000] Metaclasses in Py3K
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/18/06, Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> wrote: > > > > On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > > > > As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition, > > or did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former > > to help transition but in the latter. > > > > Development-transition only. I want to start doing it now (or next week, > or at some point in the future) without having to think about the actual > transition from py2x->py3k. > Gotcha. Well, I am sticking my neck out there and saying I am willing to write the PEP listing what names need to be changed and what modules need to go. Do you (or anyone else) want to co-author it with me? -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20061219/358fe1fa/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization
- Next message: [Python-3000] Metaclasses in Py3K
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list