[python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue May 2 14:28:44 EDT 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Tue May 2 14:28:44 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/2/2017 10:07 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:36:02 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal at egenix.com> wrote: >> IMO, it's much easier for everyone to just always point people >> to BPO for discussions and keep PRs reserved for code reviews. > > I agree with Mark-Andre here. It will take effort on our part to > make our culture be "discuss on BPO", but it will produce a much > superior history to what github PRs produce, so I think it is worth it. It would easier to move discussion to bpo if there were a clickable link from PR to bpo, just as there is in the opposite direction. I believe that there is a workflow issue to add this, but last I knew, it was bogged down in where to put the link, or something. tjr
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list