[python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
Stefan Krah
stefan at bytereef.org
Wed May 3 07:07:53 EDT 2017
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Wed May 3 07:07:53 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:06:59PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > 5. Easy reactions: no native +1 support to avoid "Usenet nod syndrome" > without spamming folks following the issue All platforms (except maybe Stackoverflow) who have voting use +1 more in a "high five" sense than for actual agreement. A lot of folks don't use these buttons out of principle so one will never get an accurate "popular opinion". Other people don't post at all because they don't like downvoting (there goes the often cited inclusiveness). Would you have liked those buttons in a memorable mailing list thread about a trivial unittest change a couple of years ago? I wouldn't. Voting should be reserved for concrete finished proposals. Stefan Krah
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Github reviews are cannibalizing BPO
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list