[python-committers] cherry picking, miss islington, and generated files
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 5 09:09:26 EST 2018
More information about the python-committers mailing list
Mon Feb 5 09:09:26 EST 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] cherry picking, miss islington, and generated files
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] cherry picking, miss islington, and generated files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5 February 2018 at 14:47, Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wijaya at gmail.com> wrote: >> We already have Travis checking 'make regen-all' and 'make clinic' >> (assuming it's working correctly). Ah, I didn't think that idea was a new one :) > The CI in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/5498 were all passing, but > I think we expected it to fail? In the end Barry regenerated the files > manually. Heh, I think I have a plausible theory as to what happened: The 3.7 and 3.8 compilers are currently still identical, and this was the first post-branch change to importlib (as far as I know), so: 1. The patch applied cleanly (because the previously frozen versions were the same) 2. The regen check passed (because the regenerated version was the same) And this is likely to continue to be the case until we either make a change to importlib or the compiler for 3.8 that we don't backport to 3.7. Whereas the cherry picking just outright failed on 3.6 because the current state of the frozen importlib on that branch is different. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] cherry picking, miss islington, and generated files
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] cherry picking, miss islington, and generated files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the python-committers mailing list