[Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
M.-A. Lemburg
mal@lemburg.com
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:07:02 +0100
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:07:02 +0100
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote: > > >>>>> "MAL" == M <mal@lemburg.com> writes: > > MAL> 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' $ locals() > > I'd prefer to hijack an existing operator -- one that's unsupported by > the string object. Perhaps / or - or & or | '/' looks nice and has this "interpret under" sort of meaning: 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' / locals() If you are more into algebra, then '*' would probably also appeal to the eye: 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' * locals() -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]