[Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
fdrake@acm.org
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:08:49 -0500
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:08:49 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
M.-A. Lemburg writes: > '/' looks nice and has this "interpret under" sort of meaning: > > 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' / locals() I'd read that more as "mapped over" rather than "interpret under". ;) > If you are more into algebra, then '*' would probably also appeal > to the eye: > > 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' * locals() But * is already meaningful for strings, so not a good choice. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]