[Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
Barry A. Warsaw
barry@zope.com
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:10:59 -0500
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:10:59 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "MAL" == M <mal@lemburg.com> writes: MAL> '/' looks nice and has this "interpret under" sort of MAL> meaning: MAL> 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' / locals() I agree, I like that one. MAL> If you are more into algebra, then '*' would probably also MAL> appeal to the eye: MAL> 'Joe has $$ $a in his pocket.' * locals() I avoid it because then you'd have to add another type test to operator-*. Ping, if you're around and care to comment, perhaps we can try to update PEP 215 and maybe add a reference implementation? -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 215 redux: toward a simplified consensus?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]