[Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:55:16 -0500
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:55:16 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Hm, maybe range() shouldn't be an iterator but an interator > > generator. No time to explain; see the discussion about restartable > > iterators. > > I think what you mean is fairly obvious. list et al. are iterator > generators, right? It's just a thing with an __iter__ function which > produces an iterator? > > If so, I tend to agree that's the right behavior for range(). > range(x,y,z) should be an immutable object. Yes. Idioms like this are used fairly often: seq = range(...) for i in seq: ... for i in seq: ... # etc. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]