[Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
Chad Netzer
cnetzer@mail.arc.nasa.gov
21 Mar 2003 14:42:07 -0800
21 Mar 2003 14:42:07 -0800
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: lists v. tuples
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 06:55, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > Hm, maybe range() shouldn't be an iterator but an interator > > > generator. No time to explain; see the discussion about restartable > > > iterators. Hmmm. Now that've uploaded my patch extending range() to longs, I'd like to work on this. I've already written a C range() iterator (incorporating PyLongs), and it would be very nice to have it automatically be a lazy range() when used in a loop. In any case, assuming you are quite busy, but would consider this for the 2.4 timeframe, I will do some work on it. If it is already being covered, I'll gladly stay away from it. :) -- Bay Area Python Interest Group - http://www.baypiggies.net/ Chad Netzer (any opinion expressed is my own and not NASA's or my employer's)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: More int/long integration issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: lists v. tuples
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]