[Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
Tristan Seligmann
mithrandi-python-dev at mithrandi.za.net
Thu Sep 8 23:13:07 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 8 23:13:07 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
* Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> [2005-09-08 13:56:07 -0300]: > Yes, you are right. But this way, you are making explicit a behavior > that will be implicit in the future. > > For example, we could also do: > > two = float(4)/float(2) > > instead of > > from __future__ import division > two = 4/2 Why does it matter if the single statement you insert is spelled "__metaclass__ = type" instead of "from __future__ import whatever"? Remember, unlike the division example, you would only have to insert one statement, as opposed to changing every use of integer division. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050908/73486fa9/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list