[Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
Russell E. Owen
rowen at cesmail.net
Fri Sep 9 20:31:47 CEST 2005
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Sep 9 20:31:47 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <20050908211307.GA506 at mithrandi.za.net>, Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi-python-dev at mithrandi.za.net> wrote: > * Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> [2005-09-08 13:56:07 -0300]: > > > Yes, you are right. But this way, you are making explicit a behavior > > that will be implicit in the future. > > > > For example, we could also do: > > > > two = float(4)/float(2) > > > > instead of > > > > from future import division > > two = 4/2 > > Why does it matter if the single statement you insert is spelled > " metaclass = type" instead of "from future import whatever"? > Remember, unlike the division example, you would only have to insert one > statement, as opposed to changing every use of integer division. It matters because "metaclass = type" is completely obscure. How would any non-expert have a clue what it means? -- Russell
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and new style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list