[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 14 12:25:03 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Feb 14 12:25:03 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: > There's also the consideration for APIs that, informally, accept > either a string or a sequence of objects. My preference these days is not to design APIs that way. It's never necessary and it avoids a lot of problems. Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list