Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Tue Feb 14 14:03:39 CET 2006

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> writes:

> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> There's also the consideration for APIs that, informally, accept
>> either a string or a sequence of objects.
>
> My preference these days is not to design APIs that
> way. It's never necessary and it avoids a lot of
> problems.

Oh yes.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  ZAPHOD:  Listen three eyes, don't try to outweird me, I get stranger
           things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
                    -- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 7

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list