[Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
Bernhard Herzog
bh at intevation.de
Thu Feb 16 20:59:10 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 16 20:59:10 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Travis E. Oliphant" <oliphant.travis at ieee.org> writes: > 2) The __index__ special method will have the signature > > def __index__(self): > return obj > > Where obj must be either an int or a long or another object > that has the __index__ special method (but not self). So int objects will not have an __index__ method (assuming that ints won't return a different but equal int object). However: > 4) A new operator.index(obj) function will be added that calls > equivalent of obj.__index__() and raises an error if obj does not > implement the special method. So operator.index(1) will raise an exception. I would expect operator.index to be implemented using PyNumber_index. Bernhard -- Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ Skencil http://skencil.org/ Thuban http://thuban.intevation.org/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list