[Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
Georg Brandl
g.brandl at gmx.net
Fri Feb 17 11:00:26 CET 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Feb 17 11:00:26 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernhard Herzog wrote: > "Travis E. Oliphant" <oliphant.travis at ieee.org> writes: > >> 2) The __index__ special method will have the signature >> >> def __index__(self): >> return obj >> >> Where obj must be either an int or a long or another object >> that has the __index__ special method (but not self). > > So int objects will not have an __index__ method (assuming that ints > won't return a different but equal int object). However: > >> 4) A new operator.index(obj) function will be added that calls >> equivalent of obj.__index__() and raises an error if obj does not >> implement the special method. > > So operator.index(1) will raise an exception. I would expect > operator.index to be implemented using PyNumber_index. I'd expect that __index__ won't be called on an int in the first place. Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list