[Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Mar 13 04:48:23 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Mar 13 04:48:23 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 12.03.11 22:36, schrieb skip at pobox.com: > Martin> I don't think any of the regular core committers got any such > Martin> explicit veto powers on any code... > > "Veto powers" is your term, not mine. I suggested that Raymond's opinion > should be accorded extra weight. This isn't the UN Security Council. Yes, but you were comparing it with ElementTree, where Fredrik *does* have veto powers. I was pointing out that the case at hand is different. Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list