skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Sun Mar 13 04:54:03 CET 2011

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

    Martin> Am 12.03.11 22:36, schrieb skip at pobox.com:
    Martin> I don't think any of the regular core committers got any such
    Martin> explicit veto powers on any code...
    >> 
    >> "Veto powers" is your term, not mine.  I suggested that Raymond's opinion
    >> should be accorded extra weight.  This isn't the UN Security Council.

    Martin> Yes, but you were comparing it with ElementTree, where Fredrik
    Martin> *does* have veto powers. I was pointing out that the case at
    Martin> hand is different.

I didn't know that, nor did I infer that Fredrik had veto power.  I wrote:

    I think we would give reasonably large weight to Fredrik Lundh's opinion
    on the change.

Skip

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list