[Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 10:39:17 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 26 10:39:17 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mentorship list
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following > PEPs from being marked Final? > > SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard Sorry for taking forever to get back to this. So I looked over PEP 389 and it's basically complete, but I never implemented the code deprecation warnings for optparse (only the documentation deprecation warnings). The PEP claims: Python 2.7+ -- If the Python 3 compatibility flag, -3, is provided at the command line, then importing optparse will issue a DeprecationWarning. Otherwise no warnings will be issued. Python 3.2+ -- Importing optparse will issue a PendingDeprecationWarning, which is not displayed by default. I'm kind of inclined to just remove those lines from the PEP since optparse is not being removed and since 2.7 and 3.2 are already out the door. If anyone thinks those deprecation warnings really need to be implemented, let me know in the next couple days. Otherwise, I'll update the PEP and mark it as final. Steve -- Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mentorship list
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list