[Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 11:28:48 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 26 11:28:48 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [issue7284] argparse - display version in usage by default
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm kind of inclined to just remove those lines from the PEP since > optparse is not being removed and since 2.7 and 3.2 are already out > the door. If anyone thinks those deprecation warnings really need to > be implemented, let me know in the next couple days. Otherwise, I'll > update the PEP and mark it as final. My recollection is that omitting the deprecation warnings was a deliberate decision during the implementation phase, so updating the PEP with a note to that effect and then marking it as final sounds like the right thing to do. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [issue7284] argparse - display version in usage by default
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list