[Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Dec 5 19:55:47 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Dec 5 19:55:47 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 04:15:08 +1100 Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On 06/12/12 03:08, Chris Withers wrote: > > > I'd like to change the docs for poll() to say: > > > > """ > > Check if child process has terminated. > > If it has, the returncode attribute will be set and that value will be returned. > > If it has not, None will be returned and the returncode attribute will remain None. > > """ > > > > Any objections? > > Possibly because it is 4am here, I had to read this three times to understand it. > How is this instead? > > """ > Check if child process has terminated. Returns None while the child is still running, > any non-None value means that the child has terminated. In either case, the return > value is also available from the instance's returncode attribute. > """ I like this wording. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list