[Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 05:26:36 CET 2012
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Dec 6 05:26:36 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 04:15:08 +1100 > Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > > Possibly because it is 4am here, I had to read this three times to > understand it. > > How is this instead? > > > > """ > > Check if child process has terminated. Returns None while the child is > still running, > > any non-None value means that the child has terminated. In either case, > the return > > value is also available from the instance's returncode attribute. > > """ > > I like this wording. > Steven's proposed wording sounds good to me, too. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121206/97dd705c/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] slightly misleading Popen.poll() docs
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list