[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 16:23:59 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 21 16:23:59 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Mar 21, 2013, at 05:25 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > >>1. Whether IDLE should be developed separately from the core Python >>repository (while still being shipped). >> >>I really want to constructively focus on (1). > > In fact, solving (1) should help move along the discussions about separating > the stdlib into a separate repo, for the benefit of alternative > implementations. Agreed that there are many other issues to resolve in that > latter discussion. > > But I think Eli is right that we should be thinking about how to develop code > in separate repos and still ship a combined release. I think a federated repo model in general is something we need to consider, it's not something we should consider IDLE specific. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list