[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
Georg Brandl
g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Mar 21 18:40:27 CET 2013
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 21 18:40:27 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 21.03.2013 16:23, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >> On Mar 21, 2013, at 05:25 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> >>>1. Whether IDLE should be developed separately from the core Python >>>repository (while still being shipped). >>> >>>I really want to constructively focus on (1). >> >> In fact, solving (1) should help move along the discussions about separating >> the stdlib into a separate repo, for the benefit of alternative >> implementations. Agreed that there are many other issues to resolve in that >> latter discussion. >> >> But I think Eli is right that we should be thinking about how to develop code >> in separate repos and still ship a combined release. > > I think a federated repo model in general is something we need to > consider, it's not something we should consider IDLE specific. Right. Without a coordinated plan this will go the road of elementtree or simplejson. Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list