[Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Sun Apr 20 00:56:52 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Apr 20 00:56:52 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 19, 2014, at 02:12 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: >I don't see this as a key porting hassle *at all* and I don't understand >why they think this would significantly help their porting (it wouldn't). >The only real barrier is the str/bytes conversion, really, and this is even >more true for projects massively centered around IO, such as Twisted and, >I'm sure, the main (only?) reason why Twisted hasn't been ported yet. I agree. I've been trying to get rid of iter*() when porting because most of the time, there is no significant memory savings to be achieved anyway. -Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list