[Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 01:14:42 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Apr 20 01:14:42 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Apr 19, 2014, at 02:12 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > >>I don't see this as a key porting hassle *at all* and I don't understand >>why they think this would significantly help their porting (it wouldn't). >>The only real barrier is the str/bytes conversion, really, and this is even >>more true for projects massively centered around IO, such as Twisted and, >>I'm sure, the main (only?) reason why Twisted hasn't been ported yet. > > I agree. I've been trying to get rid of iter*() when porting because most of > the time, there is no significant memory savings to be achieved anyway. +1 -eric
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list