[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
Benjamin Peterson
benjamin at python.org
Wed Mar 26 22:27:54 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 26 22:27:54 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014, at 14:25, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 26, 2014, at 01:55 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > >It's not a bad idea. (I believe others have proposed an red-black tree.) > >Certainly, it requires a PEP and a few months of bikesheding, though. > > Generally, PEPs aren't necessary for simple or relatively uncontroversial > additions to existing modules or the stdlib. I would have said that, too, several years ago, but I think we've been requiring (or using anyway) PEPs for a lot more things now. OrderedDict had a PEP for example. I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list