[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Wed Mar 26 22:30:30 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 26 22:30:30 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 26, 2014, at 02:27 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >I would have said that, too, several years ago, but I think we've been >requiring (or using anyway) PEPs for a lot more things now. OrderedDict >had a PEP for example. > >I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not. Hmm, me neither! I guess if someone *wants* to go through the PEP gauntlet, I won't stop them. It builds character. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140326/ee932c29/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list