[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
Donald Stufft
donald at stufft.io
Wed Mar 26 22:37:40 CET 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 26 22:37:40 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Mar 26, 2014, at 02:27 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > >> I would have said that, too, several years ago, but I think we've been >> requiring (or using anyway) PEPs for a lot more things now. OrderedDict >> had a PEP for example. >> >> I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not. > > Hmm, me neither! I guess if someone *wants* to go through the PEP gauntlet, I > won't stop them. It builds character. > > -Barry > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/donald%40stufft.io Is that what it’s called? “character” >:] ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140326/3dc36d33/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list