Sven R. Kunze srkunze at mail.de
Thu Oct 22 13:18:41 EDT 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Generated Bytecode ...
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Yeah, that would be weird.

Really? That's ridiculous. We don't allow DEF or DeF for function 
definitions either. So, I don't see any value in it.


IMHO, It's time for a clean up again.


On 22.10.2015 19:09, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de 
> <mailto:srkunze at mail.de>> wrote:
>
>     On 22.10.2015 18:17, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
>
>
>                 anything about it. 'FbR', really?
>
>             Why not disallowing them?
>
>             I for one could live with all-lower-case AND a predefined
>             order.
>
>         Well, now it's backwards-compatibility.
>
>
>     Huh? There are no fb strings yet.
>

Best,
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151022/9dd4b69d/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Generated Bytecode ...
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list