[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
francismb
francismb at email.de
Mon Oct 26 16:17:02 EDT 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 26 16:17:02 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Sometimes order matters, and sometimes it does not. If the order does >> not have an impact on the final code, it does not matter, and making >> us have to remember an order that does not matter is a waste. > > Order that matters? You must be kidding. That would turn different types > of string extremely hard to understand because semantics differ. > > That is, btw., one reason, why I favor a fixed order (alphabetically or > something). Easy to remember and no way to misinterpret it. > Well if the order is not important and all permutations are allowed then, at least those permutations can be used as an alphabet to build a hidden channel over it :-) Regards, francis
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list