[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Apr 14 16:50:51 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 14 16:50:51 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 14, 2016, at 09:49 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: >It would be nice to hear Barry Warsow who was opposed to the PEP in >january. He wanted to wait until FAT Python was proven to really be faster, >which is still not case right now. (I mean that I didnt't run seriously >benchmarks, but early macro benchmarks are not really promising, only micro >benchmarks. I expect better results when the implemenation will be more >complete.) Although I'm not totally convinced, I won't continue to object. You've provided some performance numbers in the PEP even without FAT, and you aren't exposing the API to Python, so it's not a burden being imposed on other implementations. Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160414/5069f34c/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list