[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 17:19:24 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 14 17:19:24 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2016-04-14 22:50 GMT+02:00 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>: > Although I'm not totally convinced, I won't continue to object. You've > provided some performance numbers in the PEP even without FAT, and you aren't > exposing the API to Python, so it's not a burden being imposed on other > implementations. Cool! Ah right, the PEP evolved since its first version sent to python-ideas. I didn't recall the full context of the discussion. The PEP is now more complete and it has more known (future) use cases ;-) (now maybe also Cython?) Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 509: Add a private version to dict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list