[Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Sep 12 07:50:38 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Sep 12 07:50:38 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:01:08 -0500 David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote: > It seems unlikely, but not inconceivable, that someday in the future > someone will implement a dictionary that is faster than current versions > but at the cost of losing inherent ordering. I agree with this. Since ordering is a constraint, in abstracto it is quite understandable that relaxing a constraint may enable more efficient algorithms or implementations. Besides, I don't think it has been proven that the compact-and-ordered dict implementation is actually *faster* than the legacy one. It is more compact, which can matter in some contexts (memory-heavy workloads with lots of objects, perhaps), but not necessarily others. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list