[Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 08:36:53 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Sep 12 08:36:53 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2016-09-12 13:50 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > Besides, I don't think it has been proven that the compact-and-ordered > dict implementation is actually *faster* than the legacy one. Python 3.6 dict is slower than Python 3.5 dict, at least for a simple lookup: http://bugs.python.org/issue27350#msg275581 But its memory usage is 25% smaller. I'm curious about the performance of the "compaction" needed after adding too many dummy entries (and to preserve insertion order), but I don't know how to benchmark this :-) Maybe add/remove many new keys? I expect bad performance on the compaction, but maybe not as bad as the "hash DoS". For regular Python code, I don't expect compaction to be a common operation, since it's rare to remove attributes. It's more common to modify attributes value, than to remove them and later add new attributes. Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list