stackless python
Donn Cave
donn at drizzle.com
Thu Dec 20 00:02:03 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 20 00:02:03 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): stackless python
- Next message (by thread): stackless python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quoth "John DeWeese" <deweese at usc.edu>: | Hello, I'm a python newbie interested in using stackless python to support | hundreds of simulation objects for a game. I've checked out various articles | and it sounds great, and I've visited stackless.com. Seems that branch is | becoming a bit dated. I also see that some features such as generators (not | relevant to me) have made it into python 2.2. So, what's up, can anyone | share their experiences regarding stackless python, micro-threads, etc.? Stackless can really do miracles for an application design that has to deal with asynchronous event handling of some kind. I don't think you ever get miracles like that free, though. To work with Stackless, you really need to keep your head screwed on - in my opinion it isn't for casual use in every conceivable application. Raw continuations, anyway - I don't know microthreads, that sword is probably not so double-edged. Anyway, it's like a whole new language, and one with not much competition - I don't know, can Scheme do that stuff? Donn Cave, donn at drizzle.com
- Previous message (by thread): stackless python
- Next message (by thread): stackless python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list