stackless python
Michael Hudson
mamwh at python.net
Wed Dec 19 16:56:54 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Dec 19 16:56:54 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): stackless python
- Next message (by thread): stackless python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"John DeWeese" <deweese at usc.edu> writes: > Hello, I'm a python newbie interested in using stackless python to > support hundreds of simulation objects for a game. Cool. > I've checked out various articles and it sounds great, and I've > visited stackless.com. Seems that branch is becoming a bit dated. Well what's there works well enough, I believe. But yes, you're right. > I also see that some features such as generators (not relevant to > me) have made it into python 2.2. So, what's up, can anyone share > their experiences regarding stackless python, micro-threads, etc.? What do you want to know? As you see development on stackless seems largely to be stalled, but I believe there are plenty of people still using it. OTOH, the chances of seeing stackless python or something like it in the core are currently in the vanishing-to-nil range. We went round with this one on the newsgroup a few weeks back -- google is your friend here -- and the conclusion was there was noone willing and able to do the enormous amount of work required. CT has done the first 90% of the work, but there's still the other 90% to go, and even if the work was done, it's far from certain that Guido would accept the changes anyway. Cheers, M.
- Previous message (by thread): stackless python
- Next message (by thread): stackless python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list