[Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
mertz at gnosis.cx
Tue Apr 8 14:03:05 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Apr 8 14:03:05 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com> wrote previously: |I am unclear, though, on whether a mathematician understands |1.0 to mean 1.0000000... (a single number) or the _neighborhood_ |around 1 with one digit precision. It depends what type of mathematician (and what mathematical context). "Pure" math deals with approximations and confidence levels less often than does applied math. So in those areas, mathematicians are likely to have a first thought of Real or Rational numbers. In statistics, however, I assume every mathematician would read 1.0 as both a number and a precision. Yours, Lulu... -- mertz@ _/_/_/_/ THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY: \_\_\_\_ n o gnosis _/_/ Postmodern Enterprises \_\_ .cx _/_/ \_\_ d o _/_/_/ IN A WORLD W/O WALLS, THERE WOULD BE NO GATES \_\_\_ z e
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list